An independent cybersecurity review across major Oregon law firms reveals a wide range of results. Many organizations handle sensitive communications daily, yet show significant gaps in email authentication and transport security.
Using data from audit.emailmenow.com, we evaluated each domain across email, website, and network security — including SPF, DKIM, DMARC, MTA-STS/TLS, and security headers.
Cybersecurity Scores of Major Oregon Law Firms
Overall compliance scores from audit.emailmenow.com, measured June 5, 2026. Re-run any domain at the link to verify.
| Rank | Law Firm | Overall Score | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Klarquist Sparkman | 74% | Good |
| 2 | Bullivant Houser | 70% | Good |
| 3 | Stoel Rives | 68% | Above Average |
| 4 | Davis Wright Tremaine | 61% | Above Average |
| 5 | Tonkon Torp | 60% | Above Average |
| 6 | Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani | 60% | Above Average |
| 7 | Lane Powell | 54% | Average |
| 8 | Ball Janik | 54% | Average |
| 9 | Miller Nash Graham & Dunn | 52% | Average |
| 10 | Schwabe Williamson & Wyatt | 44% | Below Average |
What the Results Reveal
- Best performer: Klarquist Sparkman leads at 74% — 2 firm(s) reach a Good (70%+) posture.
- Lowest performer: Schwabe Williamson & Wyatt at 44%.
- 4 of 10 scored below 60%, leaving client communications exposed to spoofing and BEC.
- Common gaps include weak DMARC enforcement and missing MTA-STS.
Why This Matters in Oregon
Oregon law firms handle privileged client information across corporate, litigation, and regulatory matters. Weak email security increases Business Email Compromise, domain spoofing, and confidentiality risks under the Oregon Rules of Professional Conduct.
See also — national audit
Recommendations
- Enforce DMARC (
p=reject), strict SPF, and DKIM signing. - Add MTA-STS and website security headers.
- Run periodic domain audits and security awareness training.
Check any organization’s posture. Run a free Instant Cybersecurity Audit at audit.emailmenow.com/?industry=law-firms.
Contact EmailMeNow IT Consulting for help with email security hardening and compliance documentation.
Source & methodology: Overall compliance scores from the free scan at audit.emailmenow.com, measured June 5, 2026 — each domain checked for email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), transport security (MTA-STS/TLS), website security headers, and network security. Re-run any domain at the link to verify.